Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) After Intrathoracic Migration of Nissen Fundoplication.

According to the latest IFSO recommendations, bariatric and metabolic surgery is the recommended treatment for patients with a BMI above 35 kg/m2 (with or without associated pathology), achieving good results in terms of weight loss in the medium to long term, as well as improving a significant percentage of comorbidities in this type of patient (diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)...). The incidence of GERD is higher in patients with obesity, with more severe symptoms. Over the years, Nissen fundoplication has been the gold standard treatment for patients with GERD who do not respond to medical treatment. However, in patients with obesity, gastric bypass is a valid option to consider. We present the case of a patient who had previously undergone anti-reflux surgery (laparoscopic Nissen) for GERD, with favorable evolution, who presented intrathoracic migration of the same after 8 years, with new onset of symptoms, and who was offered revision bariatric surgery. The video presents on the performance of OAGB in a patient who had previously undergone antireflux surgery, with intrathoracic Nissen. Performing this technique after a previous Nissen fundoplication (as well as migration of the Nissen) is a somewhat more complex procedure than primary surgery but can be performed safely with careful technique (there are often previous adhesions that hinder mobility and separation of the fundoplication) and provides good symptom control.

Bile reflux and marginal ulcers after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). A narrative review.

One-anastomosis gastric bypass has now become the third most commonly performed bariatric technique worldwide. However, as a consequence of the configuration of this surgery, it can present some chronic complications (anastomotic mouth ulcers and biliary reflux) that physicians must come to better understand and assess. In this narrative review, we aimed to update our knowledge of both the diagnosis and treatment of these two complications in the context of bariatric surgeries. We concluded that a series of pre-, intra-, and postoperative preventive strategies should be considered by surgeons to help reduce the appearance of these complications.

Missing Jejunal Perforation During Small Bowel Measurement in Patient Operated by Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Obesity surgery is justified as it produces sustained weight loss, increases life expectancy, and reduces the complications of obesity. For this reason, increasing numbers of patients are undergoing this surgery [1]. Complications following surgical treatment of severe obesity vary based upon the procedure performed and, although it is currently below 7% in more experienced centers, it may increase in more complex surgeries (such as revision surgery) and can be as high as 40% [2, 3]. Patients with early postoperative complications may be managed in specialist centers by the bariatric surgeon during the hospital stay [4]. Missing bowel injury may occur primarily during insertion of a Veress needle and trocar, use of electrosurgery and laser beams, suturing, and adhesiolysis [5]. Less frequently, the bowel perforation is due to the measurement of the loop and goes unnoticed. Perforation of the intestines due to any reason is a severe condition that can clinically present with free intraabdominal air, purulent or even fecal peritonitis, and abdominal compartment syndrome [6]. High clinical suspicion is crucial for early diagnosis. Early recognition of bowel injury and early intervention is crucial to reduce its morbidity and mortality [5]. METHODS: We present a case of a 50-year-old male patient with a BMI of 36.1 kg/m2, hypertension, and dyslipidemia who was proposed for bariatric surgery. A laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) was performed with no intraoperative incidents. Few hours after the surgery, the patient manifests intense abdominal pain and tachycardia (120 bpm) so we decided to order an abdominal CT scan that showed signs of jejunal perforation (pneumoperitoneum, oral contrast extravasation, and small air bubbles next to the jejunum wall). RESULTS: Emergency laparoscopy was done and showed generalized peritonitis caused by a 4-mm perforation in the mesenteric border of the jejunum with everted mucosa that was located 150 cm from the loop of Treitz. We decided to place three infraumbilical trocars to help us with washing, viewing, and surgical repair. We performed a 2-0 barbed simple suture of the perforation and extensive washing of the entire cavity with 10 L of serum. We left three drains. The patient made an uneventful recovery and was discharged 72 h after surgery with an established oral diet. CONCLUSIONS: Missing intestinal perforation is an uncommon injury during bariatric surgery, but its early diagnosis is important to avoid endangering the patient's life. Simple postoperative tachycardia in obese patients should be taken seriously as it is a warning signal. Laparoscopic reoperation in these early diagnosed cases is safe and effective, since it allows visualization and washing of the entire cavity. Bowel injuries, which may occur as a result of the insertion of an insufflation needle or trocar, are a rare complication of laparoscopy. In the case we present, the perforation occurred during the small bowel measurement so we insist on the extreme caution that surgeons must take during every detail of the surgical technique. The use of atraumatic forceps, handling of the bowel strictly at the antimesenteric side, and the infusion of sufficient methylene blue in the anastomosis testing are gestures that can help reduce the risk.

[Revision bariatric surgery after endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty]. / Revisión quirúrgica bariátrica tras gastroplastia vertical endoscópica.

BACKGROUND: Attempts are being made in recent years to replace open surgery with endoscopic techniques in some obese patients when medical treatment fails, as they are considered to be less-invasive procedures. To date, there is little scientific evidence regarding their effectiveness. CLINICAL CASES: The cases are reported of 2 patients who attended our surgery looking for an effective bariatric surgical treatment after failed endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after failure of an endoscopic technique does not offer great variation from the standard technique.

Changes in Gastric Volume and Their Implications for Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a relatively new surgical technique for the treatment of morbid obesity. It is unclear whether the volume of the gastric remnant can expand after surgery as a result of intraluminal pressure maintained over time. If this were the case, the increased volume could affect weight loss and the improvement in comorbidities. This study aims to assess the evolution of residual gastric volume (RGV) during the first year after LSG and its relationship with weight loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 112 patients who underwent LSG from February 2009 to December 2013. In order to measure the RGV after surgery, all patients were evaluated radiologically by an esophagogastroduodenal (EGD) transit at 1 and 12 postoperative months. RESULTS: All patients showed a significant reduction in BMI compared with the preoperative measurement (33.48 ± 5.78 vs. 50.54 ± 6.69 kg/m2; p < 0.001). Increased RGV was observed when comparing the results obtained by EGD transit at 1 (68.39 ± 25.89 cm3) and 12 postoperative months (122.58 ± 38.76 cm3; p < 0.001). There was no association between increase in gastric volume and weight loss at 1-year follow-up (r = 0.01; p = 0.910). CONCLUSIONS: The volume of the gastric remnant increased significantly during the first year after LSG. However, this increase was not associated with weight loss. Further prospective research with longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm or contrast the present results.

[Outcomes, controversies and gastric volume after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of obesity]. / Resultados, controversias, y volumen gástrico después de la gastrectomía vertical laparoscópica en el tratamiento de la obesidad.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a surgical procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity. However, there are still controversies regarding its efficiency in terms of weight reduction and incidence of complications. In this prospective study, the experience is presented of a referral centre for the treatment of morbid obesity with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study on 73 patients subjected to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy from February 2009 to September 2013. Patients were followed-up for a period of 12 months, evaluating the development of complications, reduction of gastric volume, and the weight loss associated with the surgery, as well as their impact on the improvement of comorbidities present at beginning of the study. RESULTS: There was a statistically a significantly reduction between the preoperative body mass index (BMI) and the BMI at 12 months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (p < 0.001), despite there being an increase in the gastric volume during follow-up, measured at one month and 12 months after surgery (p < 0.001). Five patients (6.85%) had complications, with none of them serious and with no deaths in the whole series. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of morbid obesity. Its use is associated with a significant reduction in the presence of comorbidities associated with obesity. Multicentre studies with a longer period of monitoring are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of this surgical technique.

Revisión quirúrgica bariátrica tras POSE / Bariatric revision surgery after POSE

No disponible

Revisional surgery after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

The recent increase in the frequency of bariatric surgery, especially laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, is associated with an increase in the frequency of revisional bariatric surgery. The causes of this are numerous but can be summarized as: (1) late fistulae (2) stenosis; (3) gastroesophageal reflux; and (4) weight regain (by increasing or not increasing the gastric volume). We present below a review of the clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of them.

Abdomen agudo secundario a diverticulitis yeyunal perforada / Acute abdomen secondary to perforated jejunal diverticulitis

No disponible

[Making easier what is difficult: continuous suture in intracorporeal anastomosis]. / Haciendo fácil lo difícil: la sutura continua en la anastomosis intracorpora.

Bariatric surgery requires a high level of training and detailed knowledge of advanced laparoscopy, especially when carrying out intracorporeal anastomosis. The following presentation shows two examples used by our group, which consists of slipknots done at the beginning and the end of the thread that allows us to do the suture quickly and securely.

La práctica de la cirugía bariátrica requiere adiestramiento especial, con dominio de la laparoscopia avanzada, sobre todo en la realización de anastomosis intracorporales. Enseguida se exponen dos recursos utilizados por nuestro grupo que consisten en "lazos corredizos" que se realizan al inicio y al final del hilo y que permiten efectuar la sutura de forma rápida y segura.

Fístula crónica refractaria a tratamiento tras gastrectomía vertical laparoscópica / Treatment of refractory chronic fistula following laparoscopic vertical gastrectomy

No disponible

Technical controversies in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a recently developed technique for treating morbid obesity. Since it is a simple procedure, many bariatric surgeons have adopted it in recent years with good results. However, there is still no standard procedure across different surgical teams. We will discuss the more controversial aspects of the surgical technique: the size of the bougie, the beginning of the distal section, the section shape at the gastroesophageal junction, the necessity and manner of reinforcing the staple line, and the routine use of intraoperative leak testing.